Head to head

Agents

• Arlo vs Instinct

  This is the clearest philosophical split in the directory.

• Boardy vs Series

  Both make introductions and neither uses a normal app.

• Catch vs Orchid

  Both do email, calendar and booking, and they disagree about your data in a way neither markets.

• dots vs Instinct

  Instinct lives in an iMessage thread, is reached by invitation, publishes no price and describes no step where it stops to ask.

• dots vs Muse

  Two agents with a cloud computer of their own, from two of the largest companies here, launched three weeks apart.

• Duckbill vs Instinct

  The two most opposite products here.

• folk vs Poke

  The axis is what happens to what you tell it.

• Instinct vs Muse

  The comparison everybody is actually making, and it is not about capability.

• Instinct vs OpenClaw

  Two different things that get typed into the same search box.

• Instinct vs Pally

  One you have to be invited to and it acts before asking.

• Instinct vs Poke

  The comparison people make when they ask why Instinct and not Poke, a year earlier, with most of the same rows.

• Instinct vs Town

  Two products the market keeps pairing and their own founders say are not competitors: one is free and fully subsidised for a person, the other charges the company whose team uses it..

• Instinct vs Wis.ai

  Two agents that will spend your money and neither publishes a price.

• Jarvie vs Sidekicks

  Both join a group thread you already have, which is the strongest structural position in this market.

• Muse vs OpenClaw

  One is run for you by the company that owns the app it lives in.

• Muse vs Otty

  Both live in WhatsApp, which makes this the cleanest scope test in the directory.

• Muse vs Pally

  Muse is in WhatsApp because Meta owns WhatsApp.

• Muse vs Poke

  The axis is who let them in.

• Muse vs Tomo

  Muse is a general assistant that does whatever you ask.

• Muse vs Town

  These two are not in the same thread.

iMessage API providers

• Blooio vs Claw Messenger

  The axis is volume, and at the low end the cheaper option is also the better one.

• Blooio vs Linq

  The axis is simply whether a price exists.

• Blooio vs LoopMessage

  Both advertise a price well below what the working product costs, for different reasons.

• Blooio vs Sendblue

  The axis is whether your agent needs to send the first message.

• Blooio vs Tuco AI

  The axis is where the money goes.

• Claw Messenger vs Linq

  One publishes a price of five dollars and the other publishes no price at all, which makes this the widest transparency gap in the comparison..

• Claw Messenger vs LoopMessage

  Both meter, but they count different things.

• Claw Messenger vs Photon

  Both are cheap to start and cheap in opposite ways.

• Claw Messenger vs Sendblue

  The axis is volume, and the two models invert around it.

• Claw Messenger vs Tuco AI

  Both put a ceiling on you, and the ceilings are shaped differently.

• Linq vs LoopMessage

  The axis is packaging philosophy.

• Linq vs Photon

  The axis is how much you can learn before you commit.

• Linq vs Sendblue

  The axis is whether you will accept an unpublished price for a deeper feature set.

• Linq vs Tuco AI

  These two sit at opposite ends of the same axis: how much the provider will tell you.

• LoopMessage vs Photon

  The axis is what the meter counts.

• LoopMessage vs Sendblue

  The axis is bundling.

• LoopMessage vs Tuco AI

  The axis is where the unavoidable cost sits.

• Photon vs Sendblue

  The axis is whether a shared number is acceptable.

• Photon vs Tuco AI

  The axis is whether the cheap tier is usable.

• Sendblue vs Tuco AI

  The axis is how much of the machinery you want to see.

Or start from one product

A shortlist for each, ordered by how much ground it shares, with the one thing that changes if you switch to each.