Instinct vs Poke
The comparison people make when they ask why Instinct and not Poke, a year earlier, with most of the same rows. The axis is what each is allowed to do before asking: Poke texts you first and waits; Instinct acts first, holds the password to do it, and is criticised for exactly that.
Side by side
| Instinct | Poke | |
|---|---|---|
| Getting in | ||
| Channels | iMessage | iMessage, WhatsApp, Telegram |
| How you start | Invite only | Create an account |
| Who starts it | Acts without asking | Messages you first |
| Price | ||
| Pricing | Not published. The public site is one page and names no price; access is by waitlist or an invitation from a member. | Free tier; Pro $19/month; Ultra $199/month |
| What it can do | ||
| Can do | Email, Calendar and scheduling, Bookings and reservations, Travel, Task management, Web research, Phone calls, Calls people for you, Payments, Documents, Persistent memory, Talks to other people's agents | Email, Calendar and scheduling, Reminders, Travel, Web research, Task management |
| Policy | ||
| Trains on your conversations | Yes, with opt-out | Yes, with opt-out |
| Who runs it | ||
| Status | Live | Acquired |
| Company | Spear Street Technology, Inc. | The Interaction Company of California, acquired by Cognition |
Rows where the two agree are dimmed. Checked 2026-09-10.
What actually differs
They differ on getting in, price, what it can do, and who runs it. They match on policy.
Poke was first shown in September 2025, launched in March 2026, was the first independent agent Apple approved onto Messages for Business, passed 200 million messages, and was bought by Cognition in July. Instinct went from invite-only waitlist to a $2.5 billion valuation in weeks, reaches iMessage by a route Apple does not sanction, and is the product people mean when they say the consumer agent started to feel real. On the rows this directory records they are closer than the reaction to them: both are personal assistants in an iMessage thread, both read your email and calendar and book travel, both train on conversations unless you opt out, and neither publishes who carries its messages or where its model runs.
What the fields say is different is small in number and large in kind.
Before asking, or after. Poke's row says it texts you first; Instinct's says it acts first, and the most-cited complaint about it, "it acted without asking me", is the cost of the row. That is the whole of the difference a user feels: one product drafts and waits for a yes, the other returns a confirmation.
What it is handed to do that. Instinct's policy is the only one here that describes being given your username and password for other services so it can sign in as you, and since 11 September it can hold your authenticator as well. Poke's policy, forty-six thousand characters covering all of its parent's brands, does not say what it takes when you connect an account, so the row is blank. The capability that follows is the one Poke's row lacks: payments, which Instinct does through a wallet that hands it a one-time card, and phone calls out.
Who let it in. Poke is on Apple's programme, on a business number, and Cognition says it stays there through 2026. Instinct reaches iMessage by a route Apple does not sanction and publishes no number at all. That is a regulatory fact rather than a feature, and it cuts both ways: the sanctioned product cannot open a conversation you have not opened, though it can text you first once you have, which is what its row records; the unsanctioned one answers to nobody on that.
What it costs and how you start. Poke publishes three tiers, free, $19 and $199, and takes a signup. Instinct publishes no price, takes an invitation, and a user's own estimate of what it is worth to him is on the market wall at five to ten thousand dollars a month. Poke also reaches WhatsApp and Telegram; Instinct is iMessage only.
What the record holds. The sightings on this site show Instinct doing a specific thing for a named person: talking Verizon down, filing unclaimed-property claims, getting miles for a delay, checking a school portal twice a week, getting a user banned from Resy. None shows Poke doing anything, despite the message count, because the posts that name Poke are about its approval and its acquisition rather than about a chore. The gap between the two products may be persistence, how hard each keeps going before it hands the job back, and this directory has no row for that yet; what it can show is that one product's users post the outcome and the other's posted the milestone.
The thing people ask after "why not Poke" is whether Instinct is OpenClaw for people who will not run a server; that is its own page.
Instinct is for
Anyone who wants the work finished without being asked, on iMessage only, and will hand over the access that takes.
Poke is for
Anyone who wants the sanctioned route into Messages, a published price, and WhatsApp or Telegram as well, from a product that now belongs to Cognition.
The same products, against others
See every agent compared or answer five questions to narrow it yourself.