Skip to content
Messaging Agents

Blooio vs Linq

The axis is simply whether a price exists. Blooio publishes six tiers; Linq publishes none.

Side by side

Blooio, Linq compared on price, delivery, policy
BlooioLinq
Price
Advertised from$39/moNot published
The tier most people need$289/moNot published
Setup feeNoneNot published
Per-message feesNoneNone
Delivery
NumberShared or dedicatedNot published
Can message firstIncludedNot published
SMS or RCS fallbackIncludedIncluded
Policy
Compliance claimedNone publishedSOC 2 Type I and Type II, reports for 2022, 2024, 2025 and 2026, 99.95% uptime SLA, 70 controls monitored on a public trust centre, 5 subprocessors named, Annual penetration testing, Published vulnerability disclosure process
When it breaksPublishes a status pageStatus page, 99.95% SLA

Rows where the two agree are dimmed. Checked 2026-09-06.

What actually differs

They differ on price, delivery, and policy.

Blooio publishes the most complete price list in this market: a free trial capped at 20 messages, Starter at $39, Commercial Shared at $89, Inbound at $109, Commercial Dedicated at $289 per line, and Enterprise Dedicated from $195 per line at six or more. The catch is documented on its own page: everything below Commercial Dedicated is a managed pool where the sender number varies.

Linq publishes a sandbox, an Enterprise tier and a contact form. What it does publish is capability: tapbacks, read receipts and typing indicators, programmatic group threads, FaceTime, live location through Find My, and a stated 99.95% uptime SLA it describes as the only contractual one in the industry. It also holds a SOC 2 Type II claim Blooio does not. Linq publishes no price at any tier, so the cost side of this comparison cannot be made from public sources.

Blooio is for

Teams who want to compare on cost before they compare on anything else.

Linq is for

Teams who need the deepest feature set and will accept a sales process to price it.

See every provider compared or answer five questions to narrow it yourself.